Upgrade to Chess.com Premium!

Comentarios


  • hace 4 meses

    eltabu

    I played some games with white, but I see that black usually plays e6 rather than d6. NO explanation in the video against this idea.

  • hace 6 meses

    pumpupthevolume247

    A great video especially getting away with the knight of f6 which I've heard and seen can be bad.Cool

  • hace 7 meses

    fredou_79

    What is the link to the Morra site reffered to at end of lecture ? Thank you.

  • hace 8 meses

    MI Nezhmet

    Give me a line you think is good for white and let's analyze it.

  • hace 8 meses

    MI Nezhmet

    In response to Sputnick, white is not the only one allowed to study this stuff.  Accepting gives black an extra pawn, something Korchnoi used to enjoy in positions worse than these.  Korchnoi had a monster lifetime score against Tal :)    Black's ambition after declining with Nf6 is to reach a draw.  Why not win a pawn and have all three results possible? 

  • hace 8 meses

    MI Nezhmet

    GM Nigel Short said believing in Morra compensation is like believing in Santa Claus, which is a little harsh.  Black must be accurate, but isn't this true in any opening?  I like the "Mecking/Evans" defense and think it's logical.  Computers tend to agree.  White has space, but it's offset by black's extra center pawn.  I saw in some recent books authors liked an early Bf4, but that blocks the "Sozin" motifs of f2-f4-f5.  Generally speaking black can respond with h7-h6!? and even follow up with g7-g5!? to transpose to the classic black win, Smith-Evans.

  • hace 8 meses

    MI Nezhmet

    This series was about accepting, which I believe is fine for black.  Declining with 3... Nf6 is fine (see Sevillano-DeFirmian as a very important game in the declining line).  However, accepting is more principled.  It's funny that in many lines, *black* can actually get an attack!

  • hace 9 meses

    NM Darkbluelord

    I haven't looked at it with a computer but after the supposed erroneous Nxf3 the claim that bxa6 spoils it is...questionable. Nxh2 looks pretty darn scary for white. f3 loses the queen Ba4+ ke7 doesn't change things and if the q moves to say c2 then nf3! (Qh4 is a mate threat) I don't see how white survives. - NO I was completly wrong black is busted in that line, lol oh well.

  • hace 9 meses

    dragon96

    Around 13:37, after Nxf3 bxa6, why doesn't Rxb3 work?

  • hace 9 meses

    1crazyking

    so many variations in chess. That's why chess is recommended (in our family) for mental build-up.WinkWinkSmile

  • hace 9 meses

    mehmetmetingulcan

    [COMMENT DELETED]
  • hace 9 meses

    john-warner

    Great little series so far.Nice teaching style!

  • hace 9 meses

    MI pfren

    Can't Black answer 1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 e6 3.d4 cd4 4.c3 with 4...Nf6 again?

    GM Jacob Aagaard has devoted a 50-page article on the ...Nf6/d6/e6 system as anti-Alapin/Morra system in his "Experts against the Anti-Sicilian" publication. He proposes different variations than GM Delchev in his "Safest Sicilian" repertoire book.

    Both systems seem mighty good to me- white has no advantage, no tricks, and no fireworks- he must play chess to survive.

    @ sputnick: Esserman in his book suggests against this setup Tiviakov's 7.a3 (he also briefly deals with 7.Bc4 as "equal"), but he does not mention at all the simple and effective plan suggested by Aagard: 7...Nc6 8.Bd3 de5 9.de5 g6, which seems mighty fine for Black. He only covers mediocrely the other Black plan (...Bd7-Bc6 and ...Nd7) which is not regarded very highly by Aagaard.

  • hace 9 meses

    sputnick

    What is Esserman's response to this?



  • hace 9 meses

    sputnick

    Following up on my prior comment, I think the following delayed Morra might be interesting: 1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 e6 3.d4 cxd4 4.c3!? With the pawn on e6, Nf6 is not quite as good. At least Rozentalis and Hartley say in Play the 2.c3 Sicilian (p. 132) that "we don't think this is black's best plan." And if black accepts the gambit here with 4...dxc3 does white have much against this ...e6 defense?

  • hace 9 meses

    sputnick

    I totally agree with with IM pfren that 3...Nf6 is an entirely adequate reply to the Morra. In fact, 3...Nf6 is why I decided not to play the line with white. Why bother to learn all of the gambit theory when black can decline it AND be totally equal? Thus, for someone like me who has not yet had the time to learn all of the open Sicilian theory, Bb5 is the answer. It may not give white much in the Moscow variation lines, but at least white has not wasted all that time on all that Morra theory!

  • hace 9 meses

    MI pfren

    Isn't 3...Nf6 perfectly adequate for Black?

    Why should he memorize long, complex lines, and not just play chess?

    3...Nf6 kills two birds with one shot (the Morra and the Alapin). The lines suggested by Esserman in his book give white absolutely nothing.

    Sure, Black does not try refuting the gambit with 3...Nf6. But he has a fully equal, unbalanced game, and fair chances to positionally outplay white.

  • hace 9 meses

    D_for_DJ

    IM MEsserman  said he going to challenge  IM Mark Ginsburg to a death match here on chess.com

  • hace 9 meses

    D_for_DJ

    Don't be afraid of the Sicilian - unleash Mayhem in the Morra! Tongue Out

  • hace 9 meses

    D_for_DJ

    SMITH MORRA 4 LIFE!!!!

     

    Mayhem in the Morra

    (http://www.qualitychess.co.uk/products/1/165/mayhem_in_the_morra_by_marc_esserman/).

    http://www.amazon.com/Mayhem-Morra-Marc-Esserman/dp/1907982205

     

     

    Reviews

     

    GM Michael Adams, Daily Telegraph

    "A quick glance at the cover and you just know that Mayhem in the Morra is going to be lots of fun. And it proves to be so... The imaginative Marc Esserman actually has a real talent for writing."

    GM Glenn Flear, New in Chess

    "Rarely has one person had so much influence on reviving a variation long thought to be dead. Esserman has advocated the Smith-Morra for many years as a player and now he does so as a writer and theoretician...

    Mayhem in the Morra is useful not only for the many new ideas and theoretical novelties it offers but also for the strategic explanations. Easerman believes the Morra is not just about cheap tricks but has a deep positional underpinning. He does an excellent job of explaining the intricacies of this opening that goes well beyond just presenting the state of theory as he sees it."

Ir arriba

Publique su respuesta: