Upgrade to Chess.com Premium!

Ataque Indio de Rey: Defensa Simétrica

Girar el tablero

Comentarios


  • hace 3 semanas

    DevilsLibido

    The comments system here is not user friendly.

  • hace 3 semanas

    throwdogtyuo

    hi

    hi

    Please be relevant, helpful & nice!

  • hace 8 semanas

    fahadnasar

    [COMMENT DELETED]
  • hace 3 meses

    boboytijam

    Beware when there is a sacrifice move

  • hace 5 meses

    shyamkishan

    [COMMENT DELETED]
  • hace 8 meses

    bulletplayer2004

    I like these puzzles, but they are a bit challenging

  • hace 8 meses

    bulletplayer2004

  • hace 9 meses

    Jusup_BsN

    that's good for both sides as the prove see the match v.smyslov vs m.botvinnik

  • hace 14 meses

    Keerthi1998

    [COMMENT DELETED]
  • hace 15 meses

    mikaelj

    I dont like the symmetrical idea. I think it is to much of a copy pattern.

  • hace 18 meses

    wjcsz

    A strange opening.

  • hace 20 meses

    Creeten

    [COMMENT DELETED]
  • hace 20 meses

    Creeten

    [COMMENT DELETED]
  • hace 20 meses

    wormrose

    There is a very interesting variation here in which White plays 3.b4 called the Extended Fianchetto, Reti/Smyslov variation. Smyslov played it 19 times including a world championship game vs Botvinnik. With it, he logged 12 wins 7 draws and 0 losses; defeating the likes of Gufeld and Korchnoi.



  • hace 21 meses

    SicilianDragon101

    i dont know about this one i need a good opening to play  give me some ideas

  • hace 22 meses

    Mh1664

  • hace 2 años

    royallim01

    :D çok saçma

  • hace 2 años

    jason1

    Kings Indian is solid but study the French Agesr it e3

  • hace 2 años

    jason1

    I use the French def because it has a good c5 out and queen sac if I know how to do it

  • hace 2 años

    MisterBoneman

    The idea of slow positional play is easily applied to both sides of the board. It can transpose into any of several lines, depending on your preferences. Me? I like the Accelaerated Dragon, and this is a possible transposition into the closed game. 

    I have only just begun experimenting with using White as a King's Indian game, and, my bungling aside, it suits my nature. I am not a fast thinker...I suppose a few have found that out and pounded me into the ground like a tent stake...but, I have found that it isn't easy to break through EITHER side. There seem to be few replies available in a lot of cases, which can be a good thing or not... Develop one's QB through an opposing fianchetto, develop via after a QP move, or, maneuvering around the Bishop leaving it statically guarding the b Pawn. Then the consideration of the Knights is also minimalized, though opposit of the fianchettoed Bishop, Na3 (or Na6) is another exiting point with either b5 (4) in mind or to c2 (c7) guarding agaist incursions via Q side.

    The idea of simplifying the game like that eases planning. Although, dang! I HAVE walked into some serious minefields, before, too. From BOTH sides of the King's Indian.

    Opinionated, aren't I?

    d=^))

    no... just a friendly chess enthusiast!

Ir arriba

Publique su respuesta: