¡Hay 12133 jugadores conectados!
Hombre vs. Máquina - ¡Buena suerte!
Partidas por correspondencia
¡Vota por la jugada ganadora!
¿Te consideras apto?
¡Mejora tu visión táctica!
¡Recibe consejos e ideas!
¡Aprende de los mejores!
¡Ver millones de partidas!
¡Tu entrenador virtual!
¡Perfecciona tus aperturas!
¡Prueba tus habilidades!
¡Encuentra el mejor maestro!
¿Puedes resolverlo cada día?
¡Unifica tus conocimientos!
¡Principiantes, empiecen aquí!
¡Haz amigos y juega en equipo!
¡Noticias del mundo del ajedrez!
¡Busca a otros miembros!
¡Buscar clubes y eventos locales!
¿Quién es tu mejor amigo?
¡Lee lo que los miembros dicen!
Some are easy, while some are hard (not so obvious). What is the best way to solve mate in two? Other than knowing tactics, is there a certain strategy?
Well, composed puzzle are not so much about tactics as about "themes".
You probabl have to approach them differently from regular positions. Many have very little basis in reality. I always say puzzles are not chess, but a seperate discipline using the rules of chess.
I guess if ou understand all or some of the themes, you might spot the patterns easier
I practice mate puzzles to help my tactical vision without moving pieces. How differently?
Lemme give ou an example. This puzzle, (like many others) is more about the composer trying to accomplish a task, and not setting a problem for a solver.
This is a theme called starflights. The black king is on e2 (the centre of the star) d1, f1, d3, f3 are the points of the stars. If the king escapes to any of these squares, there is a seperate and different mate for each square.
Well, mate is when you give check and the opponent can't evade it.
So - the second move has to be a check. Now what has to happen in the first move to get a mate for your check? -> Make sure the checking piece can't be taken or blocked and the king can't run away, either ...
Not that simple. Some mates are forced, meaning you have to check your opponent on the first move then give mate. But alot are not so obvious.
First try calculating all checks, captures, and mate in 1 threats on the board. Write out your calculations, then check your analysis against the answer to see what you missed. Usually it is something pretty basic, like not considering all checks, or say missing a pin.
There are also many good books on solving composed problems/studies. The classic is Howard's 'How to Solve Chess Problems'. I also like Taverner's 'Chess Problems Made Easy'. Nunn's 'Solving in Style' is supposed to be good too, and is on my wish list. I'm sure there are many others.
Even though composed problems are certainly artificial, the solutions are 100% tactical.
"Q & A with Coach Dan Heisman"
Philidor Defense: Is it worth playing as Black?
Por achja hace unos pocos minutos
Nimzowitsch's Defense answer to d4 d5 Nc3
Por bongcloudftw hace unos pocos minutos
As a lower rated player . .
Por MCBeaker hace unos pocos minutos
Show every opening you know that starts with C4
Por stas56 hace 4 minutos
Is this a real chess opening?
Por Lustchess hace 4 minutos
[HURT HEAL] OPENINGS
Por onbliss hace 5 minutos
Post your game for expert analysis
Por Seymour_Stein hace 5 minutos
Making the Chess.com Forums Better
Por batgirl hace 6 minutos
1,000 signs you play chess too much.
Por zereh hace 7 minutos
Wives of Chess Players
Por please_let_me_win hace 9 minutos
¿Por qué unirse? | Temas de Ajedrez |
Acerca de |
Preguntas Frecuentes |
Ayuda y Soporte |
Mapa del Sitio
Política de Privacidad |
Aviso Legal |
© 2014 Chess.com
• Ajedrez - Español
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!